Posts Tagged production
Innumerable financial and accounting schemes
Posted by admin in consulting, fixed costs, market forecasts, profit margin on October 5th, 2009
Innumerable financial and accounting schemes, all legal, also dilute your share of profits. Accounting tricks include non-deducted stock options, accruing unearned sales and commissions, classifying big losses as nondeducted special items, and counting pension gains as income. All tricks make earnings appear higher than they really are. Creating huge reserves in a bad year is common as well. This allows the company to then post high earnings in succeeding years. Many companies also use cash flow to speculate in the stock of hot companies. This boosts profits quickly, though it turns a solid business into a volatile investment fund. Companies also finance purchases by shaky customers. This boosts sales and profits in the shortterm but leads to huge write-offs later when the shaky customers fail.
All these accounting tricks inflate profits short-term. Higher profits justify higher salaries, bonuses, and grants of stock options. When these tricks are discovered and set right, earnings are restated and your stock price collapses. However, bonuses and salaries are long gone and stock options cashed. A series of legal accounting schemes can siphon off all earnings and leave the company bankrupt and you holding a worthless stock certificate.
Enron is a recent example. Enron used off balance sheet entities to inflate profits and enrich management. When the tricks were discovered, the stock price collapsed; outside shareholders ended up with penny stocks.
What’s So Important About Accounting? – part 1
Posted by admin in Global Markets, effective budgeting, incentive, material costs, paperwork on August 2nd, 2009
For accountants, the i proof is in the y paperwork. Accurate, well-organized records are a must. Sloppy bookkeeping is the road to financial failure—or at least to slowing down success, perhaps a lot. As a first step in becoming “accounting literate,” take the time to write down all business activities, and make sure your records are accurate.
Good salespeople know all about the items they’re selling. Really good salespeople know the engineering calibrations, size, velocity coefficients, or other technical data about their product.
Why do salespeople need to know these things? Here are some reasons:
Extensive product knowledge impresses the customer.
Product knowledge gives customers faith in the salesperson’s claims that the product is exactly what they’re looking for.
It gives the salesperson better insight into the product and its uses, which makes him or her better able to help customers believe this product is the solution to their problems.
It makes the salesperson more successful. That means higher income, greater job security, and better opportunities for promotion, besides the obvious benefits for the company.
The same argument holds true when it comes to accounting knowledge for nonfinancial managers. The more a manager knows about how the people who deal in numbers handle department finances and the methodologies they use, the more that manager will be able to intelligently work with them, making everyone’s job a little easier. So, let’s take a few steps into that world of accounting.
The Management Function in Budgeting – part 2
Posted by admin in incentive, market demand, material costs, performance objectives, profit projections on August 2nd, 2009
Shipping/Delivery seems to have climbed precipitously in the last year. Why? Clearly, this is a case where vendor price had exceeded market value. It may be a case of a long-term supplier who has gotten used to raising its prices a certain percentage each year with little incentive to remain competitive. Management should review any contracted relationship with the vendor and check the last three years’ delivery and shipping charges to note the percentage increase. Chances are it’s time to put the service out for competitive bid.
There are dozens of questions that can and should be raised, but the preceding three make the point: Setting up the budget is only half the task. The document must then be put through management scrutiny, not only to check the accuracy of its numbers and suppositions, but also to raise those issues that will enable the company to be more efficient and cost-effective.
If these questions aren’t part of the budget creation, then management is doing only half its job.
The Management Function in Budgeting – part 1
Posted by admin in budget, effective budgeting, equity, market demand, market forecasts on August 2nd, 2009
A budget is not a budget until it has been carefully scrutinized by management. Even if the numbers add up correctly, they may not have been estimated properly. It’s middle-management’s job to assemble the budget, but it’s upper-management’s job to question the budget. They do this because the budget is the financial tool that will guide the organization in the coming year. Not only does it need to be accurate, it needs to be well-considered and realistic.
In our example, the company missed the mark rather dramatically, showing a profit margin 22 percent less than the one projected in the budget. What questions should management ask?
Why is the projected actual so far off from the budgeted amount? Perhaps it was the fault of the budgetingprocess being too optimistic or of a budget based on considerations unrealistic to the current situation. Perhaps there was a significant change in market conditions or materials costs. In any of these scenarios, management needs to understand why before it can accurately assess the new year’s budget.
Production costs for Units A, B, and C do not match their profit scenario. What gives? It may be that the unit production varies and standardization needs to be applied. If a more costly unit is not earning more exponentially, it may mean that (a) the unit is improperly priced, or (b) demand has slacked off and there’s too much inventory left in the warehouse. In either case, management must look at production standards and market demand before budgeting unit-production figures for the new year.
Drafting a Budget
Posted by admin in Real estate, production cycles, profit margin, profit projections, short-term income on August 2nd, 2009
So what does a budget look like? There are numerous variations, but the goal of any budget is to clearly communicate revenue and cost centers so that profit statements can be drafted and management of resources, including income, can be better accomplished. To that degree, all budgets tend to look the same.
For the sake of this lesson, let’s assume our unit maker described earlier has been in business several years and is charged with budgeting for next year. That means he will have budgets from previous years from which to draft future business plans. The operational budget, then, likely will break revenue and expense components down to three columns:
1. The current year’s budget, or what he originally projected his income and expenses to be.
2. The current year’s projected year-end actual expenses and revenues. Even if it’s a guess, which it tends to be, it must be as accurate a guess as possible.
3. The next year’s budget, which tends to be a hybrid between the actual budget, the year-end projected actuals, and a best guess for what the new year will bring.
Fixed and Variable Costs in fiction – part 3
Posted by admin in management skills, manufacturing, marketing, material costs, performance objectives on August 1st, 2009
Decisions over semi-variable costs, such as marketing expenses, may be made based on the number of units you need to sell, but they likely are not unit-specific—unless, for example, the marketers decide to give away something free with each purchase. However, if we were to add an additional $5,000 in marketing expense to our 5,000-unit run, we add an additional dollar in semi-variable cost to each item. The same $5,000, spent on the 10,000-unit run, would add an additional 50 cents per piece.
The net cost, then, on the 5,000 unit run jumps to $8 per unit. Costs for the 10,000 unit run jump to $6.50. The net profit margins are $1 and $2.50 per unit, respectively.
Even with these costs applied, it should be evident that the higher this particular production run, the wider the profit margin. That’s all part of the sales income, to be sure. But the profitability per unit is determined primarily by the fixed and semi-variable costs. And that’s influenced by the budgeting procedure.
Fixed and Variable Costs in fiction – part 2
Posted by admin in Companies, effective budgeting, equity, material costs, profit margin on August 1st, 2009
But now let’s say each one of these units requires $3 worth of raw materials and another $2 in assembly charges to create, or $5 per unit. Since those costs are based on the number of units being produced, those costs are variable with the production flow. If you produce 5,000 units, that’s a variable cost of $25,000. Add to that your $10,000 per year in fixed costs, and you have overall production costs of $35,000, or $7 per unit. At a sales price of $9, the profit margin is $2 per unit.
But let’s increase production to 10,000 at $5 per unit in materials and assembly charges. That’s $50,000 in variable costs, plus $10,000 in fixed costs, for a total of $60,000 for 10,000 units. The price per unit is now $6, which yields a profit margin of $3 per unit.